The Truth About Marie Antoinette
History’s biggest scapegoat...
The Truth About Marie Antoinette
History’s biggest scapegoat...
The Culturist
and
Evan Amato
Oct 17, 2026
∙
Paid
51
3
10
Share
Yesterday marked the 233rd anniversary of Marie Antoinette’s execution by guillotine. To French revolutionaries, her death was a symbol of victory. But to those who know her story, it was something else entirely: one of history’s greatest injustices.
The revolutionary propaganda surrounding Marie Antoinette was so intense that even to this day, people still think she was a careless spendthrift who shouted “let them eat cake”. But the real story of her life is far more tragic, for it is the tale of an innocent young woman villainized by the media, and forced to endure unspeakable horrors at the hands of her enemies.
Today, we set the record straight on Marie Antoinette by showing how the media and public opinion turned an innocent wife and mother into one of history’s biggest scapegoats.
And the most shocking part? The tactics used against her are still eerily similar to those used today…
Join our pilgrimage through the Great Books…
We’re currently reading Dostoevsky’s
The Idiot
together. Next discussion is on October 21 — see the full reading schedule
here
.
Become a member of our book club, and you’ll get:
New, full-length essays and articles every week
Biweekly
book club discussions
and reading guides
Access to our incredible
community
of readers
The
entire archive
(200+ articles, essays, and podcasts)
An Attack on Innocence
Marie Antoinette was just 14 years old when she arrived in France. Her arranged marriage to the future King Louis XVI symbolized a new alliance between the formerly hostile powers of France and Austria, and at first the young girl expected to be received warmly. But while she found in Louis a genuinely loving husband, she could not say the same of the French court.
As a Habsburg archduchess, Marie Antoinette’s motives and intentions were viewed by French courtiers with constant suspicion. When she finally became queen four years after her marriage, paranoia exploded, and an all-out smear campaign was launched against her. Although the French people themselves were happy to welcome a foreign queen consort, many in power, it appeared, were not.
Marie Antoinette quickly became the target of vicious rumors, as pamphlets and caricatures depicted her as sexually promiscuous. These attacks served not just to discredit her personally, but to erode the respect and authority of the monarchy itself. Not for the last time, the young queen was made a scapegoat by those who intended to advance their own political causes against the Crown.
As the French Kingdom’s financial situation worsened (a problem that could have been resolved had Louis XVI actually possessed the absolute power his critics accused him of having), Marie Antoinette was targeted once more, and nicknamed “Madame Déficit” by the media. Although she enjoyed a relatively comfortable lifestyle as queen, the financial crisis in France was rooted in issues far beyond her spending, and her personal expenditures made up only a small fraction of the total royal budget. It certainly paled in comparison to the ballooning national debt, which had been inherited — but verifiably not caused — by the royal couple.
Then in 1785, the scandal of the
Diamond Necklace Affair
sent shock waves through French society. Incredibly, the centerpiece of the scandal — an astronomically expensive diamond necklace — had previously been offered to Marie Antoinette, who explicitly refused to buy it. Nonetheless, a con artist forged the queen’s signature to authorize the sale, and the resulting scandal provided aspiring revolutionaries with more ammunition against the monarchy.
Deliberate Dehumanization
All of this compounded to construct an image of Marie Antoinette as a vain spendthrift indifferent to the sufferings of the poor. In reality, these claims were (and remain) remarkably easy to debunk — even the phrase “let them eat cake”, which is still attached to her to this day, is a line from Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s 1782
Confessions
, published when Marie Antoinette was nine years old and had never stepped foot in France.
Anyone close to the royal family knew how fabricated these lies were. As French historian Hippolyte Taine notes in his
Origins of Contemporary France
, those least likely to buy into revolutionary propaganda were those who spent the most time around aristocrats — domestic servants, stablehands, etc. In other words, the working poor whom the French monarchs supposedly treated so awfully, were actually quite content.
For this reason, the propagandists had to take further steps against the monarchy, and Marie Antoinette proved once again the easiest point of attack. They jumped on her foreign origins and attempted to use even the most banal of letters to her family members as proof of treason. Quickly, this morphed into something darker, as political cartoons began to depict her as a beast and tyrant, the embodiment of all Ancien Régime corruption. This deliberate dehumanization made her later execution all the easier, as she was viewed no longer as a person, but as the face of an oppressive system that had to be overthrown.
All of this, however, pales in comparison to what the revolutionaries did next. After executing her husband, the revolutionaries then unleashed an even worse horror on Marie Antoinette and — tragically — her eight-year-old son.
What transpired before, during, and after her trial was nothing short of evil, which makes it all the more remarkable that in her final letter before her execution, Marie Antoinette wrote:
“I forgive all my enemies the injury they have done me”
...
This post is for paid subscribers
Subscribe
Already a paid subscriber?
Sign in
Previous
What did you think?
Your reaction is separate from the prediction. It won’t change your rule.