The article appears to be a summary or description of a podcast episode focusing on current events and pop culture topics, including controversies and social issues, but offers no clear in-depth analysis, personal reflective insights, or substantive exploration of mechanisms, agency, or creative work as prioritized in the preference rule. The prose is promotional and fragmentary, with sponsorship mentions and brief topic listings rather than a thoughtful essay or original reporting. The partial availability and lack of detailed argument or lived experience make it unlikely to meet the preference for clear intellectual substance and distinctive prose. Therefore, the reader would likely find it unaligned with their interest in deeper essays about personal agency and mechanism-focused analysis, resulting in a 'Dislike' rating.
How this was scored
- Rule
- María’s reading compass · v2
- Provider / model
- openai / gpt-4.1-mini
- Scored
- 2026-10-17T18:43:57+00:00
- Source text
- Revision 186 · partial
- Text selection
- All available text
- Prompt / schema
- reader-1 / reaction-1
- Settings
- {"max_output_tokens":800,"store":false}
- Tokens in / out
- 1128 / 219
- Estimated cost
- $0.000802
- Run
- #6
Exact rule used
This is an editable starter reading profile inferred from my existing subscriptions and a set of articles shared with me. Treat the examples as exploratory positive signals, not as confirmed favorite articles or evidence that I agree with their arguments.
Prioritize thoughtful essays about agency and how people build a life: learning, feedback loops, creative work, finding one's craft, relationships, friendship, conversation, and attention. Look for specific lived experience that develops into an interesting, useful idea. Make room for literary criticism, art, design, history, institutional analysis, and substantial book reviews.
Also consider AI, technology, startups, product strategy, and venture investing, reflecting my subscription mix. Favor explanations of mechanisms, concrete examples, original reporting or analysis, and arguments that acknowledge uncertainty. A piece should offer more than a headline, a trend summary, or a promotional pitch. Do not infer my political views or endorsement from the sources I follow.
Reward clear, distinctive prose and real intellectual substance. Both reflective personal writing and technically detailed analysis can fit. Length is fine when it earns its space. As an initial hypothesis, downrank repetitive advice, vague inspiration, generic hot takes, and hype unsupported by evidence. These style preferences are provisional and can be corrected with my feedback. Evaluate English and Spanish writing on substance without preferring one language.
When explaining a prediction, identify the specific connection to these themes and any mismatch. Do not give a high score solely because an author appears in my subscriptions or examples. Evaluate only the supplied article text; a title or paywall preview is not proof of the full argument.
Reference titles (sample signals; not actual ratings):
- For a long time, nothing. Then, suddenly one has the right eyes.
- Love is to be invested in someone’s continual expansion
- How to walk through walls
- Book Review: From Bauhaus To Our House
- half the world's writing should remain unpublished
- We think better when our minds are entwined
- The Hacking Will Continue While Market Morale Improves
- the delight of specificity
- Why we ended up homeschooling
- Bangers from Gibbon
- searching for your life's work is a multi-turn endeavor
- Why I Changed My Mind About AI Risk
- The hyperlocal
- The Specter Of Neuralese
- Your Book Review: Lee Kuan Yew's Memoirs
- Agentic fragments
- Average moments of a long-term meditator
- a case for sharing your dreams with friends
- the best conversations help you hear yourself
- First we shape our feedback loops; then they shape us
- timing
Exact article input
Liv Boeree joins the show this week! We discuss how NYC is protecting illegal criminals, while removing horse-drawn carriages in Central Park. Why you can no longer be mean to Claude and if we should be pushing to d/acc after a cyber attack on a grocery store. Also, woke continues to make a comeback.. women were mad at Shane Gillis after his SNL monologue, Metallica frontman James Hetfield receives hate online for not taking a side, and Kelly Clarkson battles with a small business in Brooklyn. Finally, Liv and Solana compare their X algorithms.
Thanks to our presenting sponsor
Monaco
, as well as
Eight Sleep
and
Autopilot
!
Exclusive for Pirate Wires listeners this week. Get $200 off your
Eight Sleep Pod 6
, starting, after discount, at only $1,799.
Input metadata
{"authors":"Mike Solana","availability":"partial","canonical_url":"https://piratewires.substack.com/p/yay-illegals-neigh-horse-carriages","publication":"Pirate Wires","publication_id":33,"published_at":"2026-10-17T18:27:01+00:00","subtitle":"","title":"Yay Illegals! Neigh Horse Carriages! | Pirate Wires Pod ft. Mike Solana & Liv Boeree"}